DEFENDING HOUSING ACT/HMO PROSECUTIONS

I have defended hundreds of (HMO) landlords caught up in prosecutions involving Local Authorities over the last decade. If you are being prosecuted for a breach of the Housing Act 2004 in the magistrates or Crown Court by a Local Authority or Council then please do contact me for advice direct from a barrister. Please also contact me if you are facing an interview with the Council or have received a section 16 or section 235 notice. The earlier you contact me and arrange a conference the easier it will be. I have been writing, thinking about and litigating issues concerning Houses in Multiple Occupation for many years now. There is little I have not seen when it comes to HMOs and little that surprises me in this area.

I have also defended and advised landlords who face Civil Penalty Notices and Rent Repayment Orders or indeed Banning Orders. I have been doing this sort of work for many years and have undertaken many cases, advising landlords on all manner of Housing Act breaches including section 234, section 72, section 95 and improvement notice breaches. I have real practical experience in this area and am often used on a word of mouth basis. I give frank advice but it is advice that can be trusted. I am often referred these cases by other barristers as these areas are so niche.

I am used to dealing with Local Authorities and fighting these cases to trial if there is a case. I know that Local Authorities can take a very heavy-handed approach to breaches of Housing Act law when prosecuting in the criminal courts or when facing Civil Penalty Notices and I can assist you in vindicating your rights or at the very least ensuring that you receive the lowest possible sentence.

The ramifications of prosecutions are immense. I have represented landlords being prosecuted for breaching the law relating to Houses in Multiple Occupancy. These landlords and their agents face:

1. Criminal convictions
2. Being unable to register a house as an HMO as they are deemed not fit and proper to let out properties
3. Possible orders for payment of rent back to tenants
4. Extremely large unlimited fines and costs orders
5. Rent Repayment Orders
6. The draconian process of a hearing under Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
7. Being on a Rogue Landlords’ Register
8. Facing disciplinary proceedings from their professional regulator
9. An article in the press

As a barrister my services are highly cost effective and I am the only person that you will deal with. I understand the law relating to what properties are and are not Housing in Multiple Occupancy and the law relating to when it is appropriate to prosecute.  You do not need to go to a solicitor for these types of cases but can, in the appropriate case, come to a barrister.

Often landlords will also be prosecuted for breaches of the law relating to gas checks and other important regulatory breaches. Come to me direct to discover if you have a defence.

I defend in London and the South East but will, if necessary, travel further afield. I always like an initial face to face meeting to go through the papers (which can be voluminous). I have represented businessmen and landlords accused of breaching Housing Act legislation especially through letting out rooms without registering the property as a House in Multiple Occupancy.

I always try to work with fixed fees. My rates are extremely competitive as I work alone as a barrister without the large overheads other lawyers incur. es

DEFENDING HOUSING ACT/HMO PROSECUTIONS

I have defended hundreds of (HMO) landlords caught up in prosecutions involving Local Authorities over the last decade. If you are being prosecuted for a breach of the Housing Act 2004 in the magistrates or Crown Court by a Local Authority or Council then please do contact me for advice direct from a barrister. Please also contact me if you are facing an interview with the Council or have received a section 16 or section 235 notice. The earlier you contact me and arrange a conference the easier it will be. I have been writing, thinking about and litigating issues concerning Houses in Multiple Occupation for many years now. There is little I have not seen when it comes to HMOs and little that surprises me in this area.

I have also defended and advised landlords who face Civil Penalty Notices and Rent Repayment Orders or indeed Banning Orders. I have been doing this sort of work for many years and have undertaken many cases, advising landlords on all manner of Housing Act breaches including section 234, section 72, section 95 and improvement notice breaches. I have real practical experience in this area and am often used on a word of mouth basis. I give frank advice but it is advice that can be trusted. I am often referred these cases by other barristers as these areas are so niche.

I am used to dealing with Local Authorities and fighting these cases to trial if there is a case. I know that Local Authorities can take a very heavy-handed approach to breaches of Housing Act law when prosecuting in the criminal courts or when facing Civil Penalty Notices and I can assist you in vindicating your rights or at the very least ensuring that you receive the lowest possible sentence.

The ramifications of prosecutions are immense. I have represented landlords being prosecuted for breaching the law relating to Houses in Multiple Occupancy. These landlords and their agents face:

1. Criminal convictions
2. Being unable to register a house as an HMO as they are deemed not fit and proper to let out properties
3. Possible orders for payment of rent back to tenants
4. Extremely large unlimited fines and costs orders
5. Rent Repayment Orders
6. The draconian process of a hearing under Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
7. Being on a Rogue Landlords’ Register
8. Facing disciplinary proceedings from their professional regulator
9. An article in the press

As a barrister my services are highly cost effective and I am the only person that you will deal with. I understand the law relating to what properties are and are not Housing in Multiple Occupancy and the law relating to when it is appropriate to prosecute.  You do not need to go to a solicitor for these types of cases but can, in the appropriate case, come to a barrister.

Often landlords will also be prosecuted for breaches of the law relating to gas checks and other important regulatory breaches. Come to me direct to discover if you have a defence.

I defend in London and the South East but will, if necessary, travel further afield. I always like an initial face to face meeting to go through the papers (which can be voluminous). I have represented businessmen and landlords accused of breaching Housing Act legislation especially through letting out rooms without registering the property as a House in Multiple Occupancy.

I always try to work with fixed fees. My rates are extremely competitive as I work alone as a barrister without the large overheads other lawyers incur.,

 

DEFENDING HOUSING ACT PROSECUTIONS

I have defended hundreds of landlords caught up in prosecutions involving Local Authorities over the last decade. If you are being prosecuted for a breach of the Housing Act 2004 in the magistrates or Crown Court by a Local Authority or Council then please do contact me for advice direct from a barrister. Please also contact me if you are facing an interview with the Council or have received a section 16 or section 235 notice. The earlier you contact me and arrange a conference the easier it will be. I have been writing, thinking about and litigating issues concerning Houses in Multiple Occupation for many years now. There is little I have not seen when it comes to HMOs and little that surprises me in this area.

I have also defended and advised landlords who face Civil Penalty Notices and Rent Repayment Orders or indeed Banning Orders. I have been doing this sort of work for many years and have undertaken many cases, advising landlords on all manner of Housing Act breaches including section 234, section 72, section 95 and improvement notice breaches. I have real practical experience in this area and am often used on a word of mouth basis. I give frank advice but it is advice that can be trusted. I am often referred these cases by other barristers as these areas are so niche.

I am used to dealing with Local Authorities and fighting these cases to trial if there is a case. I know that Local Authorities can take a very heavy-handed approach to breaches of Housing Act law when prosecuting in the criminal courts or when facing Civil Penalty Notices and I can assist you in vindicating your rights or at the very least ensuring that you receive the lowest possible sentence.

The ramifications of prosecutions are immense. I have represented landlords being prosecuted for breaching the law relating to Houses in Multiple Occupancy. These landlords and their agents face:

1. Criminal convictions
2. Being unable to register a house as an HMO as they are deemed not fit and proper to let out properties
3. Possible orders for payment of rent back to tenants
4. Extremely large unlimited fines and costs orders
5. Rent Repayment Orders
6. The draconian process of a hearing under Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
7. Being on a Rogue Landlords’ Register
8. Facing disciplinary proceedings from their professional regulator
9. An article in the press

As a barrister, my services are highly cost-effective and I am the only person that you will deal with. I understand the law relating to what properties are and are not Housing in Multiple Occupancy and the law relating to when it is appropriate to prosecute.  You do not need to go to a solicitor for these types of cases but can, in the appropriate case, come to a barrister.

Often landlords will also be prosecuted for breaches of the law relating to gas checks and other important regulatory breaches. Come to me direct to discover if you have a defence.

I defend in London and the South East but will, if necessary, travel further afield. I always like an initial face to face meeting to go through the papers (which can be voluminous). I have represented businessmen and landlords accused of breaching Housing Act legislation especially through letting out rooms without registering the property as a House in Multiple Occupancy.

I always try to work with fixed fees. My rates are extremely competitive as I work alone as a barrister without the large overheads other lawyers incur.

HOUSING ACT 2004 PROSECUTION QUESTIONS TO ANSWER

These are some typical questions to consider in Housing Act prosecutions:

  • Is the property, in law, a House in Multiple Occupancy?
  • Did the Council follow the correct procedures?
  • Is the evidence admissible?
  • Do I have a “reasonable excuse” defence?
  • Has the Council disclosed all relevant information?
  • Can my case be settled without the need for a formal prosecution?
  • What matters should I put forward in mitigation?
  • Should I appeal the decision to the Crown Court or High Court?
  • Am I personally liable along with my company?

I have advised many landlords over the years along with representing these landlords in proceedings. Do contact me to see how I can help. Normally, I will ask for the papers and then arrange a formal conference with you to advise on what you need to do.

I am finally also delighted now to be a consultant with Freemans Solicitors, a Legal 500 firm, in central London. This firm has the very best in-depth experience of HMO enforcement, Rent Repayment Orders and Housing Act compliance.

Christopher Hunt
Christopher Hunt
2021-11-08
Julian Hunt is to be thoroughly recommend for his legal support and advice throughout a very difficult situation .
Rick Cook
Rick Cook
2021-10-29
Julian provided an excellent service, very helpful with his judgement and communiction that resolved the issue for me.
James Neal
James Neal
2021-09-15
Having never been before a court I understood nothing about the proceedings, what to do, when to do it.. Julian took me through everything step by step and as a result I was prepared and ready. The case went in my favour a result that wouldn't have happened if I had tried to do it myself. I recommend Julian whole heartedly.
Dominic D Chevidan
Dominic D Chevidan
2021-05-26
Highly reliable service, His knowledge on Law is outstanding. Julian is highly dedicated to achieve best outcome for the client. I highly recommend his services.
Syed Ahmad
Syed Ahmad
2021-05-18
I would recommend Mr. Julian Hunt for representation at the Magistrates’ Court to everyone who are encountering the similar situation. I instructed him under direct access scheme in relation to a traffic offence that is called Section 172 matter for which he defended the position successfully through his excellent written and oral representation at the Court. Because of his efforts and hard-work, the Court dismissed the prosecution charge. I am very grateful for the service he provided to defend the case.
Ed Hardy
Ed Hardy
2021-05-18
Julian took control of an insurance-related matter for me swiftly and competently. From our first phone call I was put at ease by his experience, able to recollect two similar cases he had worked for a very niche issue, and focus on traffic issues. The outcome was quicker and easier than could have ever been imagined: all dealt with directly by the DVLA and withdrawn, without the need for any court appearance. Good value for money, especially considering the swift outcome and assistance in reclaiming costs from the court.
leon 83
leon 83
2021-05-16
Outstanding service. Really knows the inns and outs of the law. With his knowledge and skill he has prevented a setup by the police to persecute a young man who was actually the victim of a crime and not the perpetrator . He is a delight to speak to and highly proficient in traffic law. Great value for money. I wish him all the best in his endeavours . Should the occasion arise in the future I know who to call.
Edward West
Edward West
2021-05-11
I couldn't recommend Julian enough! He recently helped me with a private issue at very short notice and did an excellent job. His knowledge and dedication to the matter was superb and helped keep me at ease through what would have otherwise been a very difficult situation. I ended up with a very positive result due to his professionalism and exceptionally hard work. Thanks for your help Julian!
Magdalene Robinson
Magdalene Robinson
2021-05-11
Julian provided representation on a traffic police matter, specifically relating to CPC and tachograph/driver records. He was instructed at quite short notice; consultation was via zoom and he quickly drafted a defence. He was both professional and approachable. We achieved the outcome we wanted (ie the prosecution discontinued their case). I should add that I am a solicitor so familiar with instructing counsel via chambers. On this occasion it was for a private matter and Julian was instructed on a direct access basis which is the first time I have tried this. I was impressed with his set-up; I thought it was easy for a member of the public to understand what they were paying for and to make payment; communication was easy and frequent. I would not hesitate to instruct Julian again.
Justin Downes
Justin Downes
2021-05-10